Shutdown Fallout and What It Means for States

Written By Camille Walsh

The federal government shutdown began at midnight after talks between the White House and congressional Democrats broke down. Critical services like mail delivery, Social Security, and Medicare payments continue, but much of the federal government is at a standstill. With both sides dug in, no one knows how long this will last - but what we do know is that the disruption will ripple into state capitols.

This edition looks at how a federal shutdown impacts states and, more importantly, how state leaders can use this moment to advance policies that prevent them from being caught flat-footed the next time Washington stalls.

At the heart of the current standoff is a fight over the COVID-era ACA premium credits. Democrats are pushing to extend them, while Republicans and the White House are resisting. State leaders should expect rhetoric around this issue to intensify in the days ahead. To prepare, we have included recent research and resources to help with messaging and education on the impact of these credits and the reasons why they should expire.

The Feds are in a Shutdown. What Now?

When Washington stalls, state governments are often the first to feel the shockwaves. Federal agencies may furlough staff, pause grant disbursements, and slow the administrative machinery that underpins everything from public health programs to transit reimbursements. States are left in the uncomfortable position of having to manage services residents depend on without knowing when the federal cash “faucet” will turn back on.

The reality is that mandatory programs like Medicaid and Social Security continue to pay benefits during a lapse, but the support systems around them, claims processing, inspections, eligibility redeterminations, and vendor payments, quickly bog down as federal staff are sidelined. Discretionary programs, which rely on annual appropriations, are even more exposed: grant disbursements, reimbursements, and cooperative efforts with federal partners stop unless specifically exempted.

In past shutdowns, governors and budget directors scrambled to front-fund critical programs, reassure providers, and even cover the costs of keeping national parks open to preserve local economies. States today face the same practical questions: how long will contingency funds last, what programs run out of cash first, and where can temporary state dollars be deployed without creating legal or political blowback later?

Immediate Program Impacts

For states, the distinction between mandatory and discretionary spending translates into very different pressures on the ground. Mandatory programs still move money, but often more slowly as federal staff are furloughed. Discretionary programs, by contrast, can be halted outright until appropriations resume. That mix produces immediate challenges across a wide range of services:

  • Medicaid and Public Health – Benefits continue, but expect delays in provider payments, prior authorization, and federal call-center support. Public health inspections and lab work normally handled by EPA or FDA may also be curtailed, putting pressure on state resources.

  • SNAP & WIC – SNAP benefits can continue for a limited window using existing authority, but prolonged lapses risk interruptions if no new funding is authorized. WIC is far more vulnerable; many states have only days of carryover funds and may need to lean on reserves to keep benefit offices open and ensure families can redeem benefits.

  • TANF & Human Services Grants – States often have unspent balances, but new cash draws are frozen during a shutdown. To maintain cash assistance and child-care slots, states may need to rely on maintenance-of-effort spending or prior-year balances until federal dollars resume.

  • National Parks & Tourism – Partial closures ripple into gateway communities, straining local economies. States must decide quickly whether to fund operations at flagship sites, knowing there is no guarantee of federal reimbursement afterward.

  • Transportation & Unemployment Insurance Administration – UI benefit checks continue, but federal funding for the staff who process claims and appeals can lag. Transit reimbursements and formula apportionments may also be delayed, forcing states to consider temporary coverage of administrative costs.

  • Environmental and Food Safety Inspections – EPA and FDA inspections are often suspended or scaled back, leaving gaps in oversight of hazardous waste sites, drinking water, or food safety. States may need to reprioritize high-risk facilities under their own authority.

  • Head Start & Early Childhood Programs – Funding halts immediately, leaving local grantees, often school districts or nonprofits, without federal reimbursements. States may need to decide quickly whether to provide bridge funding to prevent closures.

What States Should Do Now

By the time you read this, many states will already have emergency measures in place - coordination cells, cash flow reviews, and contingency planning to keep critical programs afloat. But the bigger lesson of this shutdown is clear: states cannot afford to be caught flat-footed every time Washington fails. The scramble we see today should be the catalyst to hardwire reforms that leave states permanently better prepared.

SPN’s Federalism Scorecard points to exactly the kinds of policies that strengthen state resilience and limit vulnerability to federal dysfunction. States should move beyond short-term triage and adopt these long-term protections:

  • Legislative oversight of federal grants – Require legislative approval or notification before agencies accept federal dollars so elected officials, not bureaucrats, control commitments and conditions.

  • Contingency planning for federal fund loss – Mandate that agencies maintain forward-looking plans for service continuity if federal money stops, rather than improvising when a crisis hits.

  • Federal grant cost accounting – Require agencies to estimate unreimbursed state costs of every federal grant (MOEs, staffing, infrastructure) so decisionmakers understand the full burden before signing on.

  • Transparency of federal guidance – Shine light on subregulatory directives from federal agencies by requiring state agencies to disclose the guidance they receive, preventing Washington from quietly reshaping state policy outside the law.

  • Stronger legislative tools – Establish or strengthen subpoena power and standing oversight committees so legislatures can investigate agency actions quickly when federal conditions change.

Don’t Let This Shutdown "Go to Waste"

Turn today’s triage into tomorrow’s resilience. Use this moment to push reforms that give elected leaders more oversight of federal funds, require real contingency planning, and shine light on hidden federal guidance that often shapes policy outside of the law.

  • See where your state ranks: FederalismScorecard.com

  • Take the next step: Email federalism@spn.org if you want help diagnosing vulnerabilities and identifying concrete ways your state can strengthen its resilience.

The COVID Credit Fight

At the center of this stalemate is a partisan clash over the COVID-era ACA premium credits. Democrats want to extend the subsidies and roll back portions of the One Big Beautiful Bill (rebranded as the Working Families Tax Cut Bill). So far, Republicans and the White House are holding firm. Democrats are under pressure from grassroots activists not to cave, while frontline Republicans in swing districts may feel mounting political heat if the standoff drags on.

As a refresher: the COVID-era enhanced premium tax credits were introduced under the American Rescue Plan and later extended by the Inflation Reduction Act through 2025. Under this enhanced structure, more people qualify for subsidies, even those whose incomes exceed 400% of the federal poverty level, and the amount of subsidy is larger resulting in lower out-of-pocket premiums.

Meanwhile, media outlets are already tying this fight to the looming wave of health insurance premium hikes for 2026. Expect Democrats to blame the rollback of the credits for these increases. The reality: most of the growth stems from drug costs (GLP-1s and specialty drugs, plus tariffs), hospital utilization, and workforce wage pressures. According to Peterson-KFF’s analysis of insurer filings, carriers that assumed the COVID credits expire added only about 4 percentage points to their rates, the rest is medical inflation.

Resources for Messaging

While the media is likely to frame this shutdown fight as a battle over protecting families from health insurance higher costs, the evidence shows the enhanced COVID-era credits were meant to be temporary, they are also expensive and distortionary. Here are research and op-eds from national partners working this issue on the Hill:

Camille Walsh
Next

A Preview of Federal Priorities